How do you score a portfolio company's go-to-market?

Score twelve checks from 0 to 2 and add them up out of 24. The checks cover the CRM foundation, inbound, targeting, and signals and outreach, and all read data the company already holds. Rule of thumb: 0 to 8, fix the data first; 9 to 16, fix inbound and targeting; 17 to 24, ready to scale outreach.

By FreshPlaybookPublished Last checked

You bought a company, or you are about to. The data room shows revenue. It does not show whether the go-to-market machine scales or needs rebuilding. These twelve checks answer that in a week, from the CRM, the inbox and the website.

What are the twelve checks?

Four areas, three checks each, every one scored 0, 1 or 2. Zero is the red flag. Two is what good looks like. One means it exists but runs by hand or covers part of the business.

#AreaCheckScores 0 whenScores 2 when
1CRM foundationDuplicatesSeveral records per account, cleaned by hand if at allOne record per account, and dedupe runs on its own
2CRM foundationData rulesFields filled when a rep remembers, with no source or dateRequired fields, each stamped with its source and date
3CRM foundationAccount hierarchyParents and subsidiaries sit as unrelated recordsParent and child companies linked, so a rep sees the whole group
4InboundLead enrichmentA form fill arrives as a name and an emailEnriched and scored the moment it lands
5InboundRoutingLeads sit in a queue until someone looksThe right rep gets it in minutes, with an alert
6InboundAttributionNobody can say where closed deals came fromEvery closed deal traces back to its source
7TargetingLookalikesNo list beyond the accounts reps already knowA list of companies that match the best current customers
8TargetingMarket mapTarget accounts live in spreadsheets and headsEvery target account sits in the CRM with a tier
9TargetingBuying committeeOne contact per account3 to 5 roles mapped per target account
10Signals and outreachSignalsReps hear about funding and hires on LinkedIn, if at allFunding, hiring and competitor moves feed a weekly call list
11Signals and outreachInvestor networkWarm paths exist only in the board's headsWarm paths from the fund and the board to target accounts, written down
12Signals and outreachAI outreachCold domains, pasted copy, replies in one inboxWarmed domains, AI drafts, a person approves, replies routed

How do you read the total?

Add it up out of 24 and read the band as a rule of thumb.

0 to 8: fix the data first. Nothing else works on a broken CRM. Routing a lead to the wrong duplicate, or scoring a lookalike list against customers with no industry field, wastes the build.

9 to 16: fix inbound and targeting. The leaks cost deals the company already earned, and targeting decides whether outbound has a list worth sending to.

17 to 24: ready to scale outreach. The foundation holds, so signals and outbound have data to run on.

Two checks carry extra weight. If duplicates or data rules score 0, treat the total as the lower band whatever the rest says. Clay's portfolio score matrix has the same rule: if the data foundation row scores 1, start there whatever else scores.

How does this compare with Clay's portfolio score matrix?

Clay publishes a seven-row matrix for the same job, scored 1 to 3 from manual to agentic, across data foundation, outbound, inbound, expansion, retention, closed-lost and reporting.

This scorecardClay's matrix
Rows127
Scale per row0 to 21 to 3
Bands0 to 8, 9 to 16, 17 to 247 to 10, 11 to 16, 17 to 21
Scores on its ownAccount hierarchy, buying committee, investor network, signals feedExpansion, retention, reporting
Built forA company whose pipeline is the problemA company with a customer success motion to score as well

Use theirs for a mature software company with a customer success team, and this one when the question is whether the company can find and win new customers.

Who scores it, and where does the data come from?

One person with CRM admin access, in week one. Duplicates and data rules come from a CRM export, hierarchy from the account list, the inbound checks from the form tool and the timestamps on the lead queue, attribution from closed-won opportunities, and targeting from the account list set against the customer list. Signals, the investor network and outreach come from asking the sales lead and the board, and from the sending tool if one exists.

Hg's blueprint starts the same way, with a readiness check on data quality before any AI workflow, because early failures "come from poor data foundations rather than AI tool limitations".

An interactive version is coming as a tool on this site, with the band and the first fix worked out for you. Until then, the table above and a spreadsheet do the job.

Sources

  1. Clay: AI-Enabled GTM for Private Equity, the value creation playbook (portfolio score matrix)
  2. Hg and Clay: The blueprint for AI GTM adoption (readiness check)

More on portfolio company gtm

  • Which lead lists does a portfolio company already own?

    Six: deals lost in the last 18 months, champions who changed jobs, former employees of customers, the investors' other companies, inbound leads nobody answered, and people who engage with the company's LinkedIn posts. Each is one query against data the company or its fund already holds, plus an enrichment step.

Get the next one

One email a week. We store your address and the page you signed up on. Unsubscribe in one click.